I had the pleasure of writing a paper and moderating a distinguished panel and luncheon discussion on gender in the legal profession for the 2015 ABA Insurance Coverage Litigation Committee meeting in March.
This was our second year presenting the topic at the ICLC conference. Last year’s presentation was a hit, but we were not sure how the crowd and enthusiasm would be for our second go around. WOW! What a great discussion! The audience participation and sharing of ideas was inspiring and telling of both how far women in law have come and how far we still have to go.
A study conducted by Catalyst in 2011 looked at public companies and the correlation between a company’s financial performance and the number of women on its board of directors. It found that companies with the most women board directors outperform those with the least by 16 percent on return on sales and 26 percent on return on investing capital. The numbers are even higher when looking at companies with sustained high representation of women board directors – 84 percent on return on sales, 60 percent on return on invested capital and 46 percent on return on expenses.
Our panel agreed that diverse leadership correlates with increased firm success. Given that hypothesis, why do we still see so few women at the top of law firm leadership? NAWL’s Eighth Annual National Survey on Retention and Promotion of Women in Law Firms found that 47 percent of associates were women but only 17 percent of the women were partners. Committees in charge of compensation also were found to lack diversity. Why, if everyone seems to agree diversity matters, do we still see this disparity?
It may not come as a surprise that women continue to lag behind men at all levels of law firm compensation. But did you know it was as high as 78.9 percent on average?
Sky Analytics reviewed $3.4 billion in legal bills to identify patterns and price differences by gender. What they found is surprising: at every level of expertise and size of firm, men were billed at higher rates — an average of 10 percent higher. It’s hard to imagine leadership making a conscious decision to bill a female less than her male counterpart. Regardless, it is easy to see that in a typical law firm compensation structure, billing less would inevitably translate into less pay.
The ABA Gender Equity Task Force has done extensive research and has many resources on negotiating salaries.
There are also so many people and organizations I observe acting and advocating for gender equality. In a future post, I will provide a list of some favorites, and I will explore this topic further.
Please share your thoughts on how far women in law have come … and how far we still have to go.
Never miss a post. Get Risky Business tips and insights delivered right to your inbox.
Almost time...stop by Table 43 and say hi! pic.twitter.com/pGDTSZLx7X
Didn't catch our webinar on our Bankruptcy Evidence Verification (BEV) tool? Here's a recap. Learn why we created o… https://t.co/NpQElYHPhn
Our data shows that mesothelioma filings seem to be trending down, albeit very slowly. However, many asbestos defen… https://t.co/eQk3dWVYQU
You have thousands of cases and many stakeholders needing to access, update, share, and store the same data. That's… https://t.co/02vBnt0p6u
Last Feb., we wrote about the Maryland asbestos docket and how a recent case that ruled proper application of the S… https://t.co/2Nh7CvabA4
We wish everyone a safe and joyful holiday season! pic.twitter.com/Z79A5DRusD
For nearly 25 years, Elizabeth Hanke has been a trusted advisor in both the settlement and litigation arenas, and KCIC clients can always expect her to work passionately on their behalf.Learn More About Elizabeth